SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 844

S.N.VARIAVA, V.N.KHARE
Nazir Ahmed Imamudin Raza – Appellant
Versus
Gulam Mustafa Faukat (D) – Respondent


ORDER

This is a defendant s appeal. The appellant, herein entered into an agreement with the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 on 3-2-1975 for sale of agricultural land being Survey No. 3/3 admeasuring 9¼ Gunthas at village Sopara, Taluka Vasal, District Thane (Maharashtra) for a sum of Rs. 6,000/-. It is alleged that a sum of Rs. 2,500/- was paid as earnest money. The agreement provided that the appellant shall obtain the permission of the Competent Authority under the provisions of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation & Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 for transfer of the sult lands. It was also agreed that if the permission is not obtained the vendor shall repay the earnest money along with damages. Since the appellant did take obtain the required permission, the plaintiff-respondent sent a notice dated 20-7-1979 whereby he called upon the defendant-appellant to fulfil his part of the contract. However, the appellant did not execute the sale deed. It is under such circumstances, the respondent filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement for sale of the property. The trial court decreed the suit. The said decree was affirmed by the first appellate court. The second appea



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top