SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 465

Y.K.SABHARWAL, S.P.BHARUCHA, N.S.HEGDE
Master Sumanth Ramanujam And Srikanth Ramanujam – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras – Respondent


ORDER

In view of a conflict of opinion, the following question stands referred to this court :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, in computing the capital gains arising from the transfer of original shares, the subsequent issue of bonus shares should be taken into account for the purpose of averaging and reducing the cost of acquisition of those original shares?"

The question is now covered by the decision of this Court in Escorts Farm (Ramgarh) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax1. Following that decision, the question is answered in the affirmataive and in favour of the Revenue.

The civil appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

No order as to costs.

Reference answered in favour of Revenue.

***************

Parallel Citations of other Journals :

Ramanujam v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras, 2001(6) Supreme 20

00022

00023

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top