SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1242

BRIJESH KUMAR, S.P.BHARUCHA, Y.K.SABHARWAL
Harshad S. Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.—Criminal Courts are normally constituted under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Section 6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Code’) provides for the classes of criminal courts. In addition to the provisions contained in the Code or the old Code of 1898, from time to time, enactments have been passed providing that in respect of certain offences, there will be a Special Court manned by persons having specified qualifications. In the present appeals, we are concerned with such an enactment, namely, The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (‘the Act’ for short). The passing of the Act was preceded by an Ordinance which was promulgated on 6th June, 1992.

2. It is an Act to provide for the establishment of a Special Court for the trial of offences relating to transactions in securities and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. In the year 1992, large scale irregularities and malpractices were noticed by the Reserve Bank of India in relation to transactions in both the Government and other securities, indulged in by some brokers in collusion with the banks and fina
















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top