SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1381

S.N.PHUKAN, S.S.M.QUADRI
Umashanker – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chattisgarh – Respondent


ORDER

Leave is granted.

2. The convict, in Session Trial No.26 of 1991 on the file of the learned Sixth Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, under Sections 489-B and 489-C of the Indian Penal Code (for short, I.P.C. ) who was sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment on each count, is in appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No.39 of 1992, allowing it in part on November 11, 1999. The High Court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence from three years rigorous imprisonment to two years rigorous imprisonment under Section 489-B and one year s rigorous imprisonment under Section 489-C.

3. Heard Mr. Pramod Swarup, the learned counsel appearing with Mr. Praveen Swarup, Advocate-on-Record for the appellant and Ms. Gitanjali Mohan, the learned counsel appearing with Mr. Prakash Shrivastava, Advocate-on-Record for the respondent-State.

3. The gravamen of the charge against the appellant is that on May 25, 1990 at about 10 p.m. having purchased one kilo gram of mango costing Rs. 5/- he paid a fake currency-note of Rs. 100/- to P.W. 4 who doubted its genuineness. She showed it to P.Ws. 2 and 7 who also said that it was a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top