SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1571

P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, D.P.MOHAPATRA
State Of W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Sarkar – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The judgment of the learned single judge of Calcutta High Court in C.R.No. 558 of 2000 setting aside the order passed by the Authorised Officer under the Indian Forest Act as amended in the State of West Bengal), confiscating certain tools and implements, is under challenge in this appeal filed by the State of West Bengal.

4. In a raid made by the Deputy Ranger of Moraghat Forest Range, on 29.7.1998 the premises of the saw mill of the respondent, 11 pieces of Gammer, Toon , Sisso, logs measuring 1.054 meters alongwith band saw and other implements were seized on the allegation that the forest produce (logs of timber) were illegally felled and removed out of the forest area without valid permission and transit permit and the band saw and other implements were used in commission of the forest offence. After completing the procedure prescribed under the statute the Authorised Officer-cum-Divisional Officer, Jalpaiguri District, by the order dated 11.2.2000 ordered confiscation of the forest produce (logs of timber) together with the band saw and implements. The order was passed in exercise of the power vested














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top