SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1626

R.P.SETHI, Y.K.SABHARWAL
Sukhan Raut – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sethi, J.-Appellants along with one Bhaiya Mani Raut @ Babu Muni Raut were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. They were also convicted under Section 148, 147 and 323 of the Code but no separate sentences were passed against them. The appeals filed by the convicts were dismissed vide the judgment impugned in this appeal.

2. Special Leave Petition filed by Bhaiya Mani Raut was rejected by this Court vide order dated 6.9.1999.

3. Mr. P.S. Misra, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants has submitted that there was no evidence against the appellants for holding them guilty under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Code. It is contended that the common object, as alleged and proved by the prosecution, was only with respect to forcibly dispossessing the deceased and others and not for committing the ultimate crime of murder. According to the learned counsel, the appellants, at the most can be convicted and sentenced for their individual acts. Per contra it is submitted that as the murder was committed in furtherance of the common object















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top