SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1653

B.N.AGARWAL, M.B.SHAH
Harjeet Singh @ Seeta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shah, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 10.8.2001 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Crl. Misc. No. 10947-M of 2001, whereby the bail granted to the appellant by the High Court vide its order dated 2.2.2001 in Crl. Misc. No.1772-M of 2001 has been cancelled.

3. The appellant who was charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 and 307/34 IPC moved an application for releasing him on bail. That application was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge on 26.8.2000. Appellant preferred Criminal Misc. No.1772-M of 2001 for releasing him on bail before the learned Single Judge of the High Court. That application was allowed by Mr. S.S. Nijjar, J. on 2.2.2001 by observing that appellant caused injury to the deceased on the back of the head and the post mortem examination shows that there was only one injury on the head. The Court therefore, observed that case for bail was made out.

4. Thereafter, informant filed Criminal Misc. No. 10947-M of 2001 for cancellation of bail by pointing out that as per the post mortem examination there were three injuries on the head of the deceased. It was also point











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top