SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 79

S.N.VARIAVA, S.S.M.QUADRI
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bareilly – Appellant
Versus
Kisan Sehkari Chini Mill LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.-Heard Mr. Altaf Ahmad, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellants and Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent.

2. Leave is granted.

3. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in ITA No. 155/97 dated October 15, 1999 taking the view that the following question is not a statable question of law. The question reads as follows:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the incentive bonus paid by the assessee is allowable under Section 37 if it is not admissible under specific Section 36(1)(ii) of the I.T. Act, 1961?"

4. We have perused the order of this Court in Civil Appeal No. 3507 of 1998 dated July 24, 1988 as also the order of this Court in Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 15305-15307 of 1987 dated May 11, 1988. We are of the view that the question for consideration by this Court in Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.15305-15307 of 1987 dated May 11, 1988 was a different question. The aforementioned question is directly covered by the order of this



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top