SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 6

2002(1) Supreme 7
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Punjab & Haryana High Court)
V.N. Khare and B.N. Agrawal, JJ.
State of Punjab -Appellant
versus
Tehal Singh & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 5826 of 1999
Decided on 7-1-2002
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Ranbir Yadav, Advocate for R.S. Suri, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 4 : K.K. Mohan, Advocate.
For the Respondents Nos. 1-3 : Hari Shankar K. Advocate.

IMPORTANT POINT
Power exercisable under Sections 3 and 4 of Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 is legislative in character thus while exercising that power no question of application of rule of natural justice arises.

Headnote:(i) Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994-Sections 3 and 4-Whether State Govt. was required to give an opportunity of hearing to the residents of the area excluded from Gram Sabha Wazidpur and now included in the Gram Sabha Khanpur before issuing notifications under Sections 3 and 4 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, respectively declaring territorial area of Gram Sabha Khanpur and establishing Gram Sabha Khanpur?-(No) (see Paras 4 to 10).

       Held : For the aforesaid reasons, we are of the view that no opportunity of hearing was required to be given before making declarations either under Section 3 or Section 4 of the Act by the Government. (Para 10)

       (ii) Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994-Sections 3 and 4-Whether the notifications under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act could be issued simultaneously? (Yes)-High Court reversed.

       Held : Coming to the second question, the High Court had taken a view that since an opportunity of hearing was required to be given before issuing a declaration under Sections 3 of the Act, therefore, notifications under Section 3 and 4 could not have been issued simultaneously has to be held erroneous, once we held that no opportunity of hearing was required to be given before issue of declaration under Section 3 of the Act. (Para 11)

       (iii) Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994-Section 3(i) and 3(ii)-Whether the Harijan colony being not contiguous to the village Khanpur it could not have been included in Gram Sabha Khanpur u/s. 3(ii) of the Act (It is partially contiguous)-High Court allowing writ petition-Whether correct ? (No)-Appeal allowed.

       Held : So far as the third question is concerned, we have been shown the map of villages Gram Sabha Wazidpur and Khanpur and on its perusal we find that Harijan Colony although not totally, but partially is contiguous to village Khanpur and, therefore, there was substantial compliance of provision of sub-section (i) of Section 3 of the Act, and, therefore, the view taken by the High Court was erroneous. (Para 12)

       Held finally : For the reasons aforestated, this appeal deserves to be allowed. The judgment under challenge is set aside. The appeal is allowed. Since none has appeared on behalf of the respondents, there shall be no order as to costs. (Para 13)

       

JUDGMENT

V.N. Khare, J.-There is a village called Wazidpur in Block Ghal Khurd in the district of Firozepur, Punjab. For the said village and certain other adjoining areas, Gram Sabha, Wazidpur was constituted and established under Section 4 of the Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the 1952 Act ). The areas included in the said Gram Sabha were villages Khanpur and Harijan Colony. After 73rd Constitutional amendment Act, 1992 came into force Punjab legislature enacted the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in conformity with the provisions of Part IX of the Constitution. After the Act came into force, it appears that the residents of village Khanpur represented to the Government for having an independent Gram Sabha for village Khanpur by including certain portions of area of Gram Sabha, Wazidpur. The Government after making inquiry issued notifications dated 24.10.97 under Sections 3, 4 and 10 of the Act respectively. By the said notification, the Government under Section 3 of the Act declared the territorial area of Gram Sabha Khanpur comprising of abadi portions of village Wazidpur and villages Khanpur and Harijan Colony. By another notification of the same date, the Government declared the establishment of Gram Sabha, Khanpur under Section 4 of the Act. The Government also constituted Gram Panchayat for the Gram Sabha, Khanpur. It was at this stage, respondent No. 1, who was Sarpanch of Gram Sabha, Wazidpur and respondent No. 2, who was the Member of the Gram Panchayat Wazidpur filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the notifications dated 24.10.97. The contentions raised by the writ petitioners before the High Court, inter alia, were that no opportunity of hearing having been afforded before declaring the territorial area of village Khanpur inasmuch as before establishing Gram Sabha, Khanpur, the notifications were invalid; that, the locality Harijan Colony not being contiguous to village Khanpur, the said locality could not have been included in Gram Sabha Khanpur and, that, the notifications under Section 3 and 4 of the Act could not have been issued simultaneously and, therefore, the notifications are invalid. The aforesaid contentions advanced by the writ petitioners found favour with the High Court. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed and the impugned notifications dated 24.10.97 to the extent it related to the Gram Sabha, Khanpur were set aside. It is against the said judgment of the High Court, the State of Punjab has preferred this appeal by way of special leave petition.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant assailed the reasoning given by the High Court and argued that none of the reasons given by the High Court while allowing the writ petition is tenable in law and, therefore, the judgment under challenge deserves to be set aside. None has appeared for the respondents writ petitioners.

3. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the view that following questions arise for our consideration in this appeal.

(1) Whether the State Government was required to give an opportunity of hearing to the residents of the area excluded from Gram Sabha Wazidpur and now included in the Gram Sabha Khanpur before issuing notifications under Sections 3 and 4 of Act, respectively declaring territorial area of Gram Sabha Khanpur and establishing Gram Sabha Khanpur;

(2) whether the notifications under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act could be issued simultaneously; and

(3) whether the Harijan colony being not contiguous to the village Khanpur it could not have been included in Gram Sabha Khanpur under Section 3(ii) of the Act.

4. Coming to the first question, it is necessary to set out the relevant provisions of Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, which are as under:

"3. Establishment of Gram Sabha areas.-(1) The State Government may, by notification, declare any vi
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top