SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 288

D.P.MOHAPATRA, BRIJESH KUMAR
Kerala Agro Machinery Corporation LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Bijoy Kumar Roy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Brijesh Kumar, J.-Leave granted.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. This appeal has been preferred against the order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi dated August 5, 1999 dismissing the Revision petition filed by the appellant against the orders passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission West Bengal.

4. The complainant, who is respondent No. 1 in this appeal purchased a Kuboto power tiller on 21.4.1988 from the appellant, namely Kerala Agro Machinery Corporation Limited at its Malda branch, through its dealer. West Bengal Agro Industries Corporation. According to the respondent No. 1, the Power Tiller started giving trouble within the warranty period, in respect whereof he made a complaint for repairs and replacement of certain parts, but the complaint was not considered nor defects removed, hence ultimately he filed a complaint before the District Consumer Forum Malda on 16.6.1994.

5. The District Consumer Forum, Malda by order dated 15.9.1994 allowed the claim of respondent No.1 and directed that the Power Tiller be replaced by a new one. A compensation of Rs. 2,000/- and all costs were also awarded to th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top