SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 314

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, B.P.SINGH
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Rashtriya Ispat Nigam LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shivaraj V. Patil, J.-The only point urged by the learned counsel for the appellants before us is that there was a transfer of right to use the machinery by the respondent in favour of the contractors by collecting hire charges looking to the clauses contained in the agreement. As such it was liable to pay sales tax under Section 5-E of The Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short the Act ). On behalf of the respondent, the learned senior counsel made submissions supporting the impugned order pointing out to the various clauses contained in the agreement.

2. Section 5-E reads:-

"5-E. Tax on the amount realized in respect of any right to use goods-

Every dealer who transfers the right to use any goods for any purpose whatsoever, whether or not for a specified period, to any lessee or licencee for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, in the course of his business shall, on the total amount realised or realisable by him by way of payment in cash or otherwise on such transfer or transfers of the right to use such goods from the lessee or licencee, pay a tax at the rate of five paise in every rupee of the aggregate of such amount realized or realisa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top