ORDER

This appeal is directed against the judgment of a learned single judge of Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant. The appellant was appointed for a period of two years on probation by letter dated 15th June, 1998, and she joined the school on 18th June, 1998. Before expiry of the period of two years, her services stood terminated by letter dated 24th April, 2000 indicating therein that her services are no longer required. In the letter of termination it had also been indicated that the employer had warned the employee in writing about certain drawbacks in her work, and such acts are not beneficial to the employer. Be it as stated that the employer had issued a notice to show cause to the appellant by letter dated 22nd March, 2000, and the appellant had filed her show cause. After issuance of the letter of termination, the appellant approached the school tribunal contending inter alia, that the order is penal in nature, and is a camouflage excise of rights of the employer in terms of appointment, though it is penal in nature and therefore the order of termination must be set aside, inasmuch as there has been no full-fledged enquiry nor there has bee