R.C.LAHOTI, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
Harbhajan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Press Council Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.C. Lahoti, J.-The controversy centres around the interpretation of sub-section (7) of Section 6 of the Press Council Act, 1978 (hereinafter the Act , for short), viz., for how many terms of the Council a member can be nominated?
2. The facts are jejune. Harbhajan Singh, the appellant, is an editor of Indian Observer. All India Small and Medium Newspapers Federation, the respondent No. 2 is an association of persons within the meaning of clause (b) of sub-section (4) of Section 5 of the Act. The appellant had been a member of the Council for two terms of three years each, namely, 1982-85 and 1985-88. Steps were taken for the constitution of the Seventh Council commencing from holding the year 1998. A notification in that regard was issued on 21.11.1997. On 5.5.1997 and 9.8.1997 the Federation - respondent No. 2 had sought for a clarification-cum-opinion from the Chairman of the Press Council of India as to whether a person who had already been a member of the Council for two terms earlier is eligible for being nominated though such nomination did not amount to re-nomination, that is to say, at the time of being nominated he was not a retiring member. In response, the Cou
Siraj-il-Haq Khan & Ors. v. The Sunni Central Board of Waqf U.P. & Ors.
Nagendra Nath Dey & Anr. v. Suresh Chandra Dey & Ors.
General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Ltd. v. Janmahomed Abdul Rahim
F.S. Gandhi (Dead) by Lrs. v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax
D.R. Venkatachalam etc. v. Dy. Transport Commissioner & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.