SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 325

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, V.N.KHARE, ASHOK BHAN
Raj Kumar Johri – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

In September, 1977 for acquisition of more than 600 hectares of land, a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short the Act ) was issued for the purpose of development of Ujjain, a historical town in Madhya Pradesh. On September 17, 1980, for different reasons the notification was quashed. On 21st August, 1985 the impugned notification was issued afresh under Section 4(1) of the Act. Declaration under section 6 was issued on 25th of July, 1986. The award was made on 22nd July, 1988.

2. The appellants whose land had been acquired filed Writ Petition No. 1707 of 1986 challenging the notification under Section 4 and the declaration under section 6 of the Act to the extent of the acquisition of their land. Indore Bench of the High Court rendered the judgment annulling the notification issued under section 4 of the Act by holding that Scheme No. 23 framed under M.P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 did not operate against certain specified land of the respondent Ujjain Vikas Pradhikaran (hereinafter referred to as the Development Authority ).

3. The Development Authority, being aggrieved, against the judgment of the High Court filed Civil Appeal N

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top