SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 240

Joseph Joseph – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sethi, J.-Leave granted.

2. The Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Inspector, appointed under the Kerala Toddy Welfare Fund Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to "the Act") held the appellants to be the employers of the workers employed for running the Toddy shop and thus liable to pay an amount of Rs. 72,048/- and interest of Rs. 23,641/- towards Welfare Fund. The appellants filed a writ petition in the High Court alleging that they were not the employers of the workers within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Act as they themselves were the employees of Joy Kourian, respondent No. 4 who was the licensee of the shop where the toddy was being sold. The High Court negatived their plea vide the judgment impugned, hence appeal.

3. It is not disputed that the business in the Abkari Shop No. 68 of Erattupetta Range was being conducted by respondent No. 4 with the help of the appellants. Respondent No. 4 had been granted the licence and under Rule 6(23) of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2001 the licensee is obliged not to sell or otherwise transfer the privilege granted or the licence issued without the written consent of the Assistant Excise Commissioner concerned and subject to th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top