SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 416

S.N.VARIAVA, S.S.M.QUADRI
Sau. Saraswatibai Trimbak Gaikwad – Appellant
Versus
Damodhar D. Motiwale – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.N. Variava, J.-This Appeal is against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 23rd August, 1999.

2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:

One Narayan Motiwale was the owner of certain pieces of land. He had a son named Dattatraya and a daughter named Tarabai. On the death of Narayan Motiwale, Dattatraya became the owner of the properties. By a registered Settlement Deed dated 12th January, 1927, Dattatraya gave Survey Nos. 21/3, 20 and 20/1 to his sister Tarabai as she was poor and unable to maintain herself. The said Deed of Settlement, inter alia, provided as follows :

"Land bearing No. 21 and the well in the same is given to along with trees and things thereon has been given to your possession for maintenance until life. Therefore you may cultivate the said land by paying the Government assessment for maintenance. After your lifetime the land shall again come to me or to my heirs."

Pursuant to the Deed of Settlement the name of Tarabai was entered in the revenue records as a Kabjedar.

3. Tarabai leased out one piece of land to a tenant in 1968. Dattatraya filed suit No. 362 of 1969 against Tarabai for a declaration that he was the owner of the land in question and th









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top