ASHOK BHAN, DORAISWAMY RAJU
Munithimmaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Raju, J.-Special leave granted.
2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 2.3.2000 of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No. 2083 of 1996, wherein the relief sought in the nature of a writ of certiorari to quash the entire acquisition proceedings pertaining to Survey No. 81/6 in Agrahara Dasarahalli Village, Yeswanthapura Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, and the Award said to have been passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore, Development Authority, on 22.2.1995, came to be rejected on the ground that the matter is covered against the appellant by an earlier Division Bench Judgment reported in Khoday Distilleries Limited v. State of Karnataka [ILR 1997 Kar. 1419]. For appreciating the points raised as well as the grievance sought to be made out, it would be necessary to advert to certain salient factual details pertaining to the matter.
3. The appellant claims to be the owner in possession of the land comprised in Survey No. 81/6, Agrahara Dasarahalli Village, Yeswanthapur Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk. Permission was said to have been obtained by the appellant on 2.8.1969 from the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore, sanction
The Special Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board, Mysore v. P. Govindan
The Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board, Bangalore v. H. Narayanaiah Etc.Etc.
Farid Ahmed Abdul Samad & Anr. v. The Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad & Anr.
Mariyappa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.