D.P.MOHAPATRA, P.VENKATARAMA REDDI
T. Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Kannammal – Respondent
ORDER
The defendants have filed these appeals against the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of Karnataka in regular first appeal No. 129/93 decreeing the suit for specific performance of contract of sale. The appeals are inter-linked with each other while C.A. No. 3750/98 is filed by defendant No. 2 who is the subsequent purchaser of the property, C.A. No. 3751/98 is by defendant No. 1 - the vendor.
2. The respondent herein filed the suit, O.S. No.10453/82 in the court of the additional city civil judge, Bangalore for a declaration that the sale deed dated 18.5.1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of the second defendant is not a legal document; for permanent injunction restraining the second defendant from alienating the property to any one else; from interfering with possession of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property and for a decree of specific performance directing the defendant to execute and register a sale deed in respect of the suit schedule property in favour of the plaintiff, in the alternative for a direction to the first defendant for return of the advance consideration, the plaintiff had paid to him.
3. The case of the plaintiff shorn of unne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.