SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 108

D.P.MOHAPATRA, P.VENKATARAMA REDDI
T. Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Kannammal – Respondent


ORDER

The defendants have filed these appeals against the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of Karnataka in regular first appeal No. 129/93 decreeing the suit for specific performance of contract of sale. The appeals are inter-linked with each other while C.A. No. 3750/98 is filed by defendant No. 2 who is the subsequent purchaser of the property, C.A. No. 3751/98 is by defendant No. 1 - the vendor.

2. The respondent herein filed the suit, O.S. No.10453/82 in the court of the additional city civil judge, Bangalore for a declaration that the sale deed dated 18.5.1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of the second defendant is not a legal document; for permanent injunction restraining the second defendant from alienating the property to any one else; from interfering with possession of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property and for a decree of specific performance directing the defendant to execute and register a sale deed in respect of the suit schedule property in favour of the plaintiff, in the alternative for a direction to the first defendant for return of the advance consideration, the plaintiff had paid to him.

3. The case of the plaintiff shorn of unne










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top