SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 494

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, R.P.SETHI
Mandhari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chattisgarh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dharmadhikari, J.-The appellant s conviction and sentence of imprisonment under Section 302 Indian Penal Code passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge Ambikapur (Surguja) vide judgment dated 9.2.1987 has been confirmed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh by its Judgment dated 6.11.1996 in Criminal Appeal No. 200 of 1987. The appellant has approached this Court after obtaining Special Leave against his conviction and sentence.

2. The case of the prosecution against the appellant is that on 13-5-1985 at about 4.00 p.m. he killed his wife Kassobai @ Singerjheen by strangulating her. It is also alleged that he falsely stated to Patel (PW1) and Kotwar (PW-2) of the village that his wife had committed suicide. It is further alleged that it is only on the advice of the Patel and Kotwar that he gave intimation of death (Ex.P-8) on 14.5.1985 at 9.00 a.m. in Police Station Jai Nagar and on the basis of which a formal FIR (Ex.P-9) was recorded.

3. The case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence which has been accepted both by the trial court as well as the High Court in appeal.

4. The most culpable circumstance found to have been proved and accepted by the courts below





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top