JUDGMENT

Shah, J.-Short question is-whether prosecution can produce additional documents which are gathered during investigation, after submitting charge-sheet under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) at Bombay by judgment and order dated 26th July, 2000, rejected Miscellaneous Application No. 338 of 2000 in Special Case No. 3 of 1997 filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for production of additional documents in a case where application for discharging the respondents was filed. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the CBI has preferred this appeal.

3. The prosecution story in brief is that-during the period 2.4.1992 to 20.5.1992, the FIM Division, Mumbai of Syndicate Bank received funds aggregating to Rs. 132.23 crores for Portfolio Management from Oil Industries Development Board, New Delhi. It was alleged that R. Sundaresan, the then Divisional Manager of the Bank and other bank officials conspired during the above said period at Mumbai along with Directors and office bearers of M/s. Fair Growth Investments Ltd. and M/s. Fair Growth Financial Services Ltd. and by dishonestly and f