SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 639

2002(4) Supreme 340
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Punjab and Haryana High Court)
D.P. Mohapatra, Brijesh Kumar and D.M. Dharmadhikari, JJ.
Shakti Zarda Factory (I) Pvt. Ltd. -Petitioner
versus
M/s. Kathil Tobacco Bhandar & Ors. -Respondents
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 18193 of 2001
Decided on 9-5-2002
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner : Amitabh Chaturvedi, Amarjit Singh and Ms. Rakhi Ray, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Ms. S. Janani and Himanshu Munshi, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
In the facts of case, Delhi High Court is directed to decide the suit within six months of communication of this order. Till then Punjab suit will remain stayed subject to stay order passed in this SLP by Apex Court.

Headnote:Constitution of India-Article 136 -C.P.C., 1908-Section 7-Copyright and Trade Marks Act-Both parties filed suits against each other relating to the dispute over use of mark "Swagat" for their tobacco products-Petitioner filed suit in Punjab Court-Stay order passed-Modified by P & H High Court-SLP against-Respondent filed suit in Delhi High Court-Also filed application under Section 10 C.P.C. to stay Punjab suit-Both pending-Supreme Court in SLP passed stay order-What relief be granted-Delhi High Court suit should proceed expeditiously-Punjab suit should remain stayed subject to stay order of Supreme Court-SLP disposed off accordingly.

       Held : This Court by the order dated 30.10.2001 passed in the present special leave petition granted stay of operation of the impugned order and injuncted the respondents from using the name swagat on the Tobacco products manufactured by them. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case we are of the view that the suit pending in the Delhi High Court should be disposed of expeditiously. Accordingly, it is ordered that the Delhi High Court will dispose of suit No. 1210/2001 titled. M/s. Saket Kathil vs. M/s. Shakti Zarda Factory (I) Pvt. Ltd. expeditiously within six months of communication of this order. Till disposal of the suit by the trial Court the interim order passed by this Court on 30th October, 2001 shall continue. It is further ordered that the suit No. 1 of 2001 pending in the Court of Additional District Judge (II) Muktsar titled M/s. Shakti Zarda Factory (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jiwan Lal Rana & Ors. etc. will remain stayed till disposal of the aforementioned suit by the Delhi High Court. The Special leave petition is disposed of on the above terms. No cost. (Paras 4, 5 and 6)

       

JUDGMENT

D.P. Mohapatra, J.-Feeling aggrieved by the interim order passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court on 7.9.2001 in FAO No. 2911/2001, the petitioner M/s. Shakti Zarda Factory (I) Pvt. Ltd., filed this special leave petition. By the impugned order the learned Single Judge modified the order dated 12.6.2001 of the Additional District Judge, Muktsar, to the extent that the appellant i.e. M/s. Kathil Tobacco Bhandar respondent No. 1 herein, shall stand restrained from using the name Swagat on its Tobacco products within the territory of the State of Punjab and Haryana and further that the order shall be subject to the order, if any, passed by the Delhi High Court in the matter which is pending between the parties.

2. By the order dated 12.6.2001 passed in suit No. 1 of 2001 the Additional District Judge-II Muktsar (D) had restrained the defendants, respondents herein, from using the trade mark and from infringing copy right of the plaintiff-Company, petitioner herein, in the name of Swagat .

3. From the documents placed before us it appears that both the parties have filed suits against each other relating to the dispute over use of the mark swagat for their products. While the respondents have filed suit No. 1210 of 2001 against the petitioner which is pending in the Delhi High Court, the petitioner has filed suit No. 1/2001 which is pending in the Court of the Additional District Judge (II) Muktsar (D). The respondents have also filed an application under Section 10 of Civil Procedure Code for stay of the petitioner s suit. That application is pending. Further the records show that the courts, the Additional District Judge-II, Muktsar, the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Delhi High Court have passed interim orders in the suits filed by the parties.

4. This Court by the order dated 30.10.2001 passed in the present special leave petition granted stay of operation of the impugned order and injuncted the respondents from using the name swagat on the Tobacco products manufactured by them.

5. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case we are of the view that the suit pending in the Delhi High Court should be disposed of expeditiously. Accordingly, it is ordered that the Delhi High Court will dispose of suit No. 1210/2001 titled. M/s. Saket Kathil vs. M/s. Shakti Zarda Factory (I) Pvt. Ltd. expeditiously within six months of communication of this order. Till disposal of the suit by the trial Court the interim order passed by this Court on 30th October, 2001 shall continue. It is further ordered that the suit No. 1 of 2001 pending in the Court of Additional District Judge (II) Muktsar titled M/s. Shakti Zarda Factory (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jiwan Lal Rana & Ors. etc. will remain stayed till disposal of the aforementioned suit by the Delhi High Court.

6. The Special leave petition is disposed of on the above terms. No cost.

(N.K.R.) SLP disposed of accordingly.

**************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top