SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 744

2002(5) Supreme 242
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Patna High Court)
Shivaraj V. Patil & B.N. Agrawal, JJ.
Shankar Mahto & Anr. -Appellants
versus
State of Bihar -Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 195 of 2001
With
Criminal Appeal No. 196 of 2001
Decided on 31-7-2002
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : Shambhu Pd. Singh and Debasis Misra, Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, (AC), Advocates.
For the Respondent : Saket Singh and B.B. Singh Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Keeping in mind the serious allegations made against the appellants who are responsible for triple murder no interference is called in the award of 10 years RI to them by courts below.

Headnote:(i) Murder Trial-Evidence of child witnesses PW2 and PW4-They were not specifically named but mentioned in a general way-Trial Court as well as High Court believing their presence-Whether sustainable? (Yes) (See Para 6).

       (ii) Murder Trial-Identification of recovered dead body from river-Tattoo marks on the arms of the deceased-Whether such marks disappear?-Variance in evidence of identifier and doctor-Whether makes identification doubtful? (No) (See Para 7).

       (iii) Murder Trial-Deceased after murder alleged to have been taken away by accused-Investigation Officer found blood at the place of occurrence but not around the place of occurrence-Absence of trail of blood whether makes removal of dead body by accused doubtful? (No) (See Para 8).

       (iv) Murder Trial-Murders by several persons-Sufficient light at the time of occurrence-Accused known to the members of prosecution party-Their identification whether can be doubted? (No) (See Para 9).

       (v) Indian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 302 and 364-Three murders committed by appellants-Sentenced to 10 years R.I.-Whether be reduced to 3 Years R.I. already undergone? (No) (See Para 10)-Result-Appeals dismissed (See Para 11).

       

JUDGMENT

B.N. Agrawal, J.-In these two appeals by special leave, the appellants have assailed their convictions and sentences awarded by the trial court and upheld by the Patna High Court.

2. The short facts are that on 28th February, 1991 at about 8.00 p.m., when the informant Liro Kumari- (PW.6) along with her father Doman Mahto, mother Shibo Devi, sister Shakho Devi and children of her family was sitting near fire at the outer door of her house, all of a sudden, all the appellants along with accused Shrilal Sharma, Haro Sharma, Ram Bilash Mahto, Ram Udgar Sharma and 3-4 others armed with farsas and lathis came to the house and seeing them she and her family members out of fear ran to the courtyard of the house. The appellants and their companions following them entered the courtyard. Accused Shrilal Sharma and Haro Sharma, both of whom were armed with farsas and co-accused Ram Bilash Mahto, who was armed with lathi, caught hold of Doman Mahto, father of the informant, and took him to outer door of the house. Appellants Harilal Mahto and Jharilal Mahto, who were armed with lathis, caught hold of Shibo Devi, mother of the informant and appellants Tulbul Mahto and Shankar Mahto, who were also armed with lathis, caught hold of Shakho Devi, sister of the informant inasmuch as they were taken to outer door of the house. The informant raised alarm and when she came out from her courtyard, she saw that accused Shrilal Sharma and Haro Sharma were assaulting her father and mother with farsas and appellants Shankar Mahto, Tulbul Mahto and Sitaram Mahto were assaulting them with lathis. Appellants Jharilal Mahto, Shankar Mahto and co-accused Ram Bilash Mahto were assaulting Shakho Devi, sister of the informant. Doman Mahto, father of the informant, died on the spot and when the informant raised alarm, accused Shrilal Sharma gave a farsa blow to her in order to kill her but it caused injury on her left palm. Thereafter the appellants and their companions lifted the dead body of father of the informant and her injured mother and sister and took them away. The informant along with her nephew Arjun Mahto (PW4) came to the village where they raised alarm on which the villagers assembled, who, after arranging rickshaw, sent them to Gangor Police outpost where the fard beyan of informant was recorded by A.S.I. Dilip Kumar Singh (PW.1) on the basis of which formal first information report was drawn up at the concerned police station against twelve accused persons including the appellants.

3. Police after registering the case took up investigation during the course of which dead body of Shibo Devi, mother of the informant, was recovered from a river near Sohagi Ghat besides blood stained kurta which Doman Mahto, father of the informant, was wearing. It transpired during investigation that sister of the informant, who was assaulted, succumbed to the injuries, but her dead body and that of her father-Doman Mahto could not be recovered. Upon completion of investigation, the police submitted charge sheet against all the accused persons, on receipt whereof, learned Magistrate took cognizance and committed all the twelve accused persons, including the appellants, to the court of Session to face trial.

4. Defence of the accused was that they were innocent, falsely implicated out of animosity and no occurrence much less the one alleged had taken place.

5. During trial, on behalf of the prosecution several documents were exhibited and eleven witnesses were examined, out of whom, Satyanarain Mahto (PW.2), Arjun Mahto (PW.4) and Liro Kumari, informant (PW.6) claimed to be eye witnesses to the occurrence whereas other witnesses were police officials, seizure witnesses, medical witnesses and some formal witnesses. Upon conclusion of trial, the learned Additional Sessions Judge while convicting five appellants of these appeals and accused Shrilal Sharma and Haro Sharma, acquitted other five accused persons of all the charges. Accused Shrilal Sharma and Ha








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top