SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 841

S.N.VARIAVA, S.S.M.QUADRI
Bharatiya Gramin Punarrachana Sanstha – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.-Leave is granted.

2. This appeal is from the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, in Writ Petition No. 697 of 2001 dated April 11, 2001. By the impugned order the High Court upheld the order of the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad (for short, the Tribunal ) in Appeal No. 222 of 1997 dated January 6, 2001 directing re-instatement of the first respondent in service with 75% back wages and consequential benefits.

3. On August 6, 2001, this Court issued notice limited to the question as to why the appointment of the respondent (respondent No.1) should not be confined to the period mentioned in the order of appointment dated June 22, 1996.

4. To appreciate the contention of the learned counsel for the parties the following facts may be noticed.

5. The appellant is a public trust and a society under the Bombay Public Trusts Act and Societies Registration Act, which runs Sant Bahinabai Educational Institutions at Shioor Taluka Vaijapur, District Aurangabad, which are fully aided. The first respondent applied for the post of Lab Attendant in response to an advertisement. He w











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top