SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 551

DORAISWAMY RAJU, R.P.SETHI
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Laxman Jena – Respondent


ORDER

On a specific information received by him, Shri Priya Ranjan Patra - PW-5, recorded the information in the station diary, entry No. 57 and proceeded to house of the respondent for effecting the recovery of opium, allegedly concealed therein. The house of the accused was searched between 2 a.m. and 3 a.m. in the presence of the witnesses and opium total weighing 2.690 kgs. recovered. After compliance of the legal formalities, the contraband was seized and the accused arrested. The trial court after recording evidence found the respondent guilty for the commission of offence punishable under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, the Act ) and sentenced him rigorous imprisonment for ten years besides paying a fine of Rs. 1 lakh and in default to payment of fine to undergo further R.I. for two years and 6 months.

2. Not satisfied with the judgment of the trial court, the respondent filed criminal appeal No. 32 of 1993 in the High Court, which was allowed vide the judgment impugned and he was acquitted of the charge. The High Court found that the mandatory provisions of section 42 and section 50 of the Act had been violated.

3. Mr. R.S.


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top