SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 896

S.N.VARIAVA, S.S.M.QUADRI
Collector Of Central Excise, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Sanitaryware, Industries – Respondent


ORDER

These two appeals arise from the judgments of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal in Order No. 304/91-C in E/Appeal No. 3841/90-C dated April 1, 1991 and in Order No. 600/91-C in E/Appeal No. 2031/91-C dated July 19, 1991. The judgment in Order No. 304/91-C in E/Appeal No. 3841/90-C dated April 1, 1991 is followed in Order No. 600/91-C in E/Appeal No. 2031/91-C dated July 19, 1991.

2. The respondent, a manufacturer of sanitaryware, uses plaster of paris as inputs for the final product of sanitaryware. The process involves making of moulds from plaster of paris which are in turn used as inputs for manufacture of sanitaryware. The respondent claimed the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 217/86 (as amended by Notification No. 82/87-CE.)

3. In these cases, though the Excise authorities declined to grant the benefit of exemption, the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal set aside their orders and held that the exemption would apply to the respondent.

4. Mr. R.P. Bhatt, learned senior counsel appearing for the Revenue, contends that as the moulds of plaster of paris are goods classified under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 they cann
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top