SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 960

S.S.M.QUADRI, Y.K.SABHARWAL
Collector Of Central Excise, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Fur Fabrics LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal is filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay against the order, No. E/254/94-D, of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No. E/4217/90-D dated 29th April, 1994. By the impugned order, the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short, the Tribunal ) set aside the order of the Collector (Appeals), Bombay, affirming the order of the Assistant Collector holding that the respondent is entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 109/1986-C.E. dated 27th February, 1986, as amended by Notification No. 3/1988-C.E. dated 19th January, 1988 (for short, the Notification ).

2. The question that arises for consideration is : whether the respondent is covered by the proviso inserted in the notification?

3. The respondent-assessee manufactures high fur fabrics by silver knitting process. In Classification List No. 1/1987 dated 10th March, 1987 filed by the respondent, the product was classified under Heading 60.01 and benefit of the said notification was claimed attracting nil rate of duty. There is no dispute that the respondent was entitled to the exemption granted under the said notification till 9th January, 1988 when














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top