SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 1086

Hindustan Times – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.-By reason of this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the writ petitioners herein have questioned the validity of an order dated 24th September, 1991 as also one dated 16th October, 1991 issued by the Special Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, whereby and whereunder a direction had been issued to the effect that at the time of payment of bills for publication of Government advertisements in all newspapers having a circulation of more than 25,000 copies, 5 of the amount thereof, forming part of a fund for the purpose of granting pension to the working journalists, would be deducted.

2. Petitioner No.1 herein is a company incorporated under the Companies Act and is engaged in the business of publishing newspapers including The Hindustan Times . Petitioner No. 2 is a shareholder of Petitioner No.1 and Petitioner No. 3 is its Director.

3. The petitioners have questioned the legality/validity of the said orders, inter alia, on the following grounds :-

1. The impost, is not leviable either as a tax or as a fee having regard to the fact that the legislative field in relation to the payment of retiral benefits to










































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top