2002(8) Supreme 261
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Gujarat High Court)
M.B. Shah and D.M. Dharmadhikari, JJ.
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai -Petitioner
versus
State of Gujarat -Respondent
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 2745 of 2002
With
SLP (Crl.) No. 2755 of 2002
Decided on 18-11-2002
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner : Ujwal Kumar Jha, Aslam Ahmed, Ranjan Kumar Jha, Nakul Dewan and Ejaz Maqbool, Advocates.
For the Respondent : S.K. Dholakia, Sr. Advocate and Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate.
(ii) Practice and Procedure of Court-Criminal Trial-Identity of vehicle-There may not be any necessity of producing the vehicle before the Court-Seizure Report may be sufficient. (Para 2)
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. In our view, no further directions are required to be given in these matters. However, it is made clear that in case where accused disputes that he is not involved in the alleged incident and no article was found from him then such endorsement be taken on the photograph. Further with regard to the vehicle also, it is made clear that there may not be any necessity of producing the vehicle before the Court and the Seizure Report may be sufficient. The Special Leave Petitions are disposed of, accordingly.
(N.K.R.) SLP disposed of accordingly.
**************
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.