SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 1059

2002(8) Supreme 322
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Delhi High Court)
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri & Arijit Pasayat, JJ.
GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. -Appellant
versus
Income Tax Officer & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 7731 of 2002
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 5520 of 2002)
With
Civil Appeal Nos. 7732, 7733-34, 7735, 7736 and 7737 of 2002
(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 5522, 5524-25, 5527, 5529 and 5531 of 2002)
Decided on 25-11-2002
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : M.L. Verma, Sr. Advocate, Jagdish Kumar Chawla, V.P. Gupta, R.K. Jain, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Ranbir Chandra, Ms. Neera Gupta, Rajiv Tyagi and B.V. Balaram Das, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
When a notice under Section 148 Income Tax Act, 1961 is issued, the proper course for noticee is to file return and then to seek reasons and file objections to them on which assessing authority must pass a speaking order before proceeding with assessment.

Headnote:Income Tax Act, 1961-Sections 148 and 143(2)-Notices under to appellant-Instead of filing reply (objections) filed writ petition to High Court-High Court dismissed as pre-mature-Appeals to Supreme Court-Clarifying the procedure to be followed by assessee in such a case-Appeals are dismissed.

       Held : We see no justifiable reason to interfere with the order under challenge. However, we clarify that when a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is issued, the proper course of action for the noticee is to file return and if he so desires, to seek reasons for issuing notices. The assessing officer is bound to furnish reasons within a reasonable time. On receipt of reasons, the noticee is entitled to file objections to issuance of notice and the assessing officer is bound to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order. In the instant case, as the reasons have been disclosed in these proceedings, the assessing officer has to dispose of the objections, if filed, by passing a speaking order, before proceeding with the assessment in respect of the abovesaid five assessment years. Insofar as the appeals filed against the order of assessment before the Commissioner (Appeals), we direct the appellate authority to dispose of the same, expeditiously. With the above observations, the civil appeals are dismissed. No costs. (Paras 5, 6, 7 and 8)

       

Order

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Leave is granted.

3. By the order under challenge, a Division Bench of the High Court at Delhi dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the validity of notices issued under Sections 148 and 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court took the view that the appellant could have taken all the objections in its reply to the notices and that, at that stage, the writ petition was premature. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed on 31st January, 2001. Aggrieved by that order, the appellant is in appeal before us.

4. Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, submits that the impugned notices relate to seven assessment years; that during the pendency of these appeals, in respect of two assessment years, viz., 1995-96 and 1996-97, assessment has been completed against which appeals have been filed. Notices relating to the other five assessment years, viz., 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1997-98 and 1998-99, are now the subject-matter of these appeals.

5. We see no justifiable reason to interfere with the order under challenge. However, we clarify that when a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is issued, the proper course of action for the noticee is to file return and if he so desires, to seek reasons for issuing notices. The assessing officer is bound to furnish reasons within a reasonable time. On receipt of reasons, the noticee is entitled to file objections to issuance of notice and the assessing officer is bound to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order. In the instant case, as the reasons have been disclosed in these proceedings, the assessing officer has to dispose of the objections, if filed, by passing a speaking order, before proceeding with the assessment in respect of the abovesaid five assessment years.

6. Insofar as the appeals filed against the order of assessment before the Commissioner (Appeals), we direct the appellate authority to dispose of the same, expeditiously.

7. With the above observations, the civil appeals are dismissed.

8. No costs.

(N.K.R.) Appeals dismissed accordingly.

**************

 

 

00033

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top