SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 982

2002(8) Supreme 525
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Gujarat High Court)
M.B. Shah & D.M. Dharmadhikari, JJ.
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai -Petitioner
versus
State of Gujarat -Respondent
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 2745 of 2002
With
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 2755 of 2002
Decided on 1-12-2002
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioners : Ujwal Kumar Jha, Aslam Ahmed, Ranjan Kumar Jha, Nakul Dewan, Ejaz Maqbool, Advocates.
For the Respondent : S.K. Dholakia, Sr. Advocate and Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate.


VERY IMPORTANT POINT
To avoid State s vicarious liability for alleged misappropriation of seized articles by police concerned magistrates should exercise their powers under Section 451 Cr.P.C. 1973 judiciously and promptly as indicated in this landmark order. In no case seized valuables, currency notes, vehicles, liquors and narcotic drugs be kept in police stations for more than 15 days to one month. Registry of the concerned High Court should also see that the rules framed by the High Court with regard to such articles are implemented properly.

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973-Section 451-Order for custody and disposal of property pending trial in certain cases-Scope-Implementation with regard to valuable articles and currency notes, vehicles, liquors and Narcotic drugs to avoid State s vicarious liability-Powers to be exercised by concerned magistrates promptly and judiciously-Articles are not kept in police stations for more than 15 days to one month-Registry of High Court should see rules framed by High Court in this regard are implemented properly (Cr.P.C. 1973-Section 457-Gujarat Police Manual-Procedure by police upon seizure of IPC 1860-Sections 429, 420, 465, 468, 477-A and 114).

       Held : Section 451 clearly empowers the Court to pass appropriate orders with regard to such property, such as-

        (1) for the proper custody pending conclusion of the inquiry or trial;

        (2) to order it to be sold or otherwise disposed of, after recording such evidence as it think necessary;

        (3) if the property is subject to speedy and natural decay, to dispose of the same. (Para 5)

       To avoid State s liability in case of loss or misappropriation of such articles held to avoid such a situation, in our view, powers under Section 451 Cr.P.C. should be exercised promptly and at the earliest. (Para 10)

       For valuables and currency notes held, in no set of circumstances, the Investigating Officer should keep such articles in custody for a longer period for the purpose of investigation and identification. (Para 14)

       For vehicles held : In our view, whatever be the situation, it is of no use to keep such seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders immediately by taking appropriate bond and guarantee as well as security for return of the said vehicles, if required at any point of time. This can be done pending hearing of applications for return of such vehicles. In case where the vehicle is not claimed by the accused, owner, or the insurance company or by third person, then such vehicle may be ordered to be auctioned by the Court. If the said vehicle is insured with the insurance company then insurance company be informed by the Court to take possession of the vehicle which is not claimed by the owner or a third person. If Insurance company fails to take possession, the vehicles may be sold as per the direction of the Court. The Court would pass such order within a period of six months from the date of production of the said vehicle before the Court. In any case, before handing over possession of such vehicles, appropriate photographs of the said vehicle should be taken and detailed panchnama should be prepared. (Paras 17 and 18)

       For liquors held : For articles such as seized liquor also, prompt action should be taken in disposing it of after preparing necessary panchnama. If sample is required to be taken, sample may kept properly after sending it to the chemical analyser, if required. But in no case, large quantity of liquor should be stored at the police station. No purpose is served by such storing. (Para 19)

       For narcotic drugs held : Similarly for the Narcotic drugs also, for its identification, procedure under Section 451 Cr. P. C. should be followed of recording evidence and disposal. Its identity could be on the basis of evidence recorded by the Magistrate. Samples also should be sent immediately to the Chemical Analyser so that subsequently, a contention may not be raised that the article which was seized was not the same. (Para 20)

       Held finally : However these powers are to be exercised by the concerned Magistrate. We hope and trust that the concerned Magistrate would take immediate action for seeing that powers under Section 451 Cr. P.C. are properly and promptly exercised and articles are not kept for a long time at the police station, in any case, for not more than fifteen days to one month. This object can also be achieved if there is proper supervision by the Registry of the concerned High Court in seeing that the rules framed by the High Court with regard to such articles are implemented properly. (Para 21)

       

Judgement Key Points

Please provide the content of the legal document enclosed in tags, and I'll extract and format the key points with appropriate references (e.g., (!) (!) ).


ORDER

In these two petitions filed by the police inspectors serving the Gujarat State, it has been contended that prosecuting agency has no right to ask for remand of petitioners (accused) for the purpose of collecting evidence and the application moved for remand of the petitioners (accused) was unjustified because anticipatory bail was granted to them.

2. It is the prosecution version, as per the FIR lodged on 7.2.2002 by the Assistant Commissioner of Police D Division, Surat that petitioners and other police personnel are involved in offences punishable under Sections 429, 420, 465, 468, 477-A and 114 IPC. It is alleged that when they were working at various police stations, they have committed offences during the period from 20.2.1992 to 23.11.2001 by replacement of mudammal articles including golden ornaments by other spurious articles, misappropriation of the amount which was kept at the police station, unauthorised auction of the property which was seized and kept in the police custody pending trial and tampering with the records of police station. The High Court by its judgment and order dated 20.6.2002 rejected the application against the order passed by the trial court granting remand of the petitioner. Hence, these special leave petitions.

3. At the time of the hearing of these matters, learned counsel for the parties submitted that various articles are kept at the police station for a long period by not adhering to the procedure prescribed under Cr.P.C.; which creates difficulties for keeping them in safe custody. Finally, the sufferers are - either the State exchequer or the citizens whose articles are kept in such custody. It is submitted that speedier procedure is required to be evolved either by the Court or under the rules for disposal of muddamal articles which are kept at various police stations as most of the police stations are flooded with seized articles. It is, therefore, submitted that directions be given so that burden of the Courts as well as at the police station can, to some extent, be reduced and that there may not be any scope for misappropriation or of replacement of valuable articles by spurious articles.

4. Learned counsel further referred to the relevant Sections 451 and 457 of Code of Criminal Procedure, which read thus-

"451. Order for custody and disposal of property pending trial in certain cases.-When any property is produced before any Criminal Court during any inquiry or trial, the Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the proper custody of such property pending the conclusion of the inquiry or trial, and, if the property is subject to speedy and natural decay, or if it is otherwise expedient so to do, the Court may, after recording such evidence as it thinks necessary, order it to be sold or otherwise disposed of.

Explanation.-For the purposes of this section, "property" includes

(a) property of any kind or document which is produced before the Court or which is in its custody.

(b) any property regarding which an offence appears to have been committed or which appears to have been used for the commission of any offence,

457. Procedure by police upon seizure of property.-

(1) Whenever the seizure of property by any police officer is reported to a Magistrate under the provisions of this Code, and such property is not produced before a Criminal Court during an inquiry or trial, the Magistrate may make such order as he thinks fit respecting the disposal of such property or the delivery of such property to the person entitled to the possession thereof, or if such person cannot be ascertained, respecting the custody and production of such property.

(2) If the person so entitled is known, the Magistrate may order the property to be delivered to him on such conditions (if any) as the Magistrate thinks fit and if such person is unknown, the Magistrate may detain it and shall, in such case, issue a proclamation specifying the articles of which such property


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top