SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 436

ARIJIT PASAYAT, N.S.HEGDE, R.C.LAHOTI, RUMA PAL, S.P.BHARUCHA
Chandra Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ruma Pal, J.-A tangled web of facts and law would best describe this case which involves the question of the seniority of doctors in the Uttar Pradesh Medical Services. To untangle the factual aspect. We need to start from 1945.

2. Prior to 1945 there were two medical in thew state of U.P. - the Provincial Medical Service (PMS) and Provincial Subordinate Medical Services (PSMS). On June 14, 1945 the Government of U.P. framed rules known as The United Provinces Medical Service (Men s Branch) Rules, 1945 (referred to hereafter as the 1945 Rules ). In 1946, two new medical server were constituted, namely, PMS Grade I and PMS Grade II. On 2nd November, 1964 PMS Grade I and Grade II were merged with effect from 1st November, 1964. However, there were no rules for fixing inter-se seniority of the officers of the two erstwhile services which were so merged. The issue of the inter-se seniority between the members of the new service as merged i.e., between PMS I and PMS II, was resolved ultimately by this Court by its decision in State of U.P. v. M. J. Siddiqui 1980(3) SCC 180. As far as recruitment to the new PMS was concerned by way of a stop gap arrangement the State Government









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top