SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 883

S.N.VARIAVA, BRIJESH KUMAR
Mohd. Shahnawaz Akhtar – Appellant
Versus
1st ADJ Varanasi – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal is directed against an order dated 30.4.1997 by which the High Court has allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No. 4 herein.

2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:

The appellant who is the landlord of the premises filed a suit for eviction of respondent No. 4 from shop No. D-50/128 situated in Mohalla Kajipura Kala, Nai Sarak, Varanasi city The suit was filed on various grounds. One of the grounds was that the 4th respondent had sublet the premises to other parties. The trial court decreed the suit on this ground. The revision filed by the 4th respondent was dismissed. The respondent then filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.

3. At this stage, the limits of jurisdiction of the High Court in issuing a writ of certiorari under Article 226 of the Constitution needs to be kept in mind. It has been held by a constitution bench of this Court in the case of Syed Yakoob v. K.S. Radhakrishnan & Ors.1 as follows:

"The question about the limits of the jurisdiction of High Courts in issuing a writ of certiorari under Article 226 has been frequently considered by this Court and the true legal position in that behalf is no longer in doubt. A writ






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top