SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 5

BRIJESH KUMAR, R.C.LAHOTI
Rajendra Shantaram Todankar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.C. Lahoti, J.-Eight accused persons, namely, Ashok Bhikaji Gurav (accused No.1), Nathuram Bhikaji Gurav (accused No.2), Santosh @ Kalya Jagannath Shirwadkar (accused No.3), Santosh @ Babya Dashrath Nagvekar (accused No.4), Ravindra @ Bobby Anant Surve (accused No.5), Anant @ Papya Jagannath Shirodkar (accused No.6), Prakash @ Vatanya Laxman Pednekar (accused No.7) and Rajendra Shantaram Todankar (accused No.8) were tried on several charges framed under Sections 143, 144, 147, 302, 302/149, 302/34, 307, 307/149, 307/34, 324, 324/149, 324/34 and 324/511 IPC. On trial all the accused persons were held to have committed offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 302/149 and 324/149 IPC. For offence under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC each of the accused persons was sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment to suffer further R.I. for 6 months. For offence under Section 324/149 IPC each of the accused was sentenced to suffer R.I. for 6 months. Though all the accused were also convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 144 and 147 of the IPC but no separate sentences were awarded thereon. All the





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top