SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 27

M.B.SHAH, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
Kedia Agglomerated Marbles LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dharmadhikari, J.-The appellant M/s Kedia Agglomerated Marbles Limited is engaged in manufacture of floor tiles which are marketed by them in the trade name "Marbella Agglomerated Marbles" and "Marbellam Tiles". The product of the appellant is classified under tariff heading 68.07 for the purpose of excise duty under the Central Excise Tariff Act (for short the Act ). The above classification of the appellant s product under Tariff heading 68.07 has been confirmed by order dated 21.6.1993 passed by the Collector of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Ahmedabad.

2. On the basis of the aforesaid classification of its product under Tariff heading 68.07, appellant claimed exemption from payment of duty under Notification No. 59/91-CE dated 20-3-1990 issued by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5A of the Central Excise Act. Under the aforesaid exemption notification, mosaic tiles that is to say tiles known commercially as mosaic tiles included in Tariff heading 68.07 are exempt from payment of duty.

3. The appellant s case that the tiles manufactured by it are commercially known as mosaic tiles and are entitled to exemption wa







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top