SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 1111

Raghunath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sema, J.-These two appeals arise out of a common judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon convicting the appellants in Sessions Case No. 32 of 1995 and sentenced them to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment on the following Sections of law as under:-

Offence U/s Sentence Amount of Sentence in awarded fineImposed   default of payment

148 IPC Two years Nil -

302 IPC Imprisonment Rs. 1000/- Six months RI r/w l49IPC for life

325 IPC Three years RI Rs. 300/- Two months r/w 149 IPC RI

323 IPC Six months RI Nil -- r/w 149 IPC

452 IPC Three years RI Rs. 300/- Two months r/w 149 IPC RI

436 IPC Seven years RI Rs. 700/- Five months r/w 149 IPC RI

The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. By the aforesaid judgment all the nine accused have been convicted. The convictions and sentences have been confirmed by the High Court Criminal Appeal





















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top