SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 69

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, H.K.SEMA
Commissioner Of Police, Hubli – Appellant
Versus
R. S. More – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sema, J.-Aggrieved by the order dated 18.8.1999 passed by the High Court in W.P. No. 607 of 1999 setting aside the order dated 25.9.1998, passed by the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal at Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in application No. 17 of 1998 dismissing the application filed by the respondent, the State has come up in appeal by Special Leave. The respondent was put to notice, but despite receipt of notice, none has entered appearance on his behalf.

2. The respondent was appointed as a Police Constable on probation for a period of two years and six months. He joined service as a Police Constable on 2-6-1992. Though, the period of probation came to an end on 2-12-1994, the respondent, however, continued on the post. On 14-3-1996, probation period of the respondent was extended by one year and three months. The respondent was discharged from service by an order dated 12-11-1997 in exercise of powers under Rule 6(1) of Karnataka Civil Services (Probation) Rules, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules ) as his services during the period of probation were stated to be found unsatisfactory. Aggrieved by the order of discharge, the respondent filed a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top