SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 79

H.K.SEMA, BRIJESH KUMAR
S. M. S. Sandhu – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Brijesh Kumar, J.-Leave granted.

2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order passed by the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, dismissing the writ petition preferred by the appellant and refusing to interfere with the order passed in revision by the Advisor to the Administrator, upholding the demand of the interest from the appellant @ 24% on the amount of delayed payment of instalments.

3. Undisputedly the appellant with others purchased SCO Site No. 130-131 Sector 34, City Centre, Chandigarh in an auction held on 22.2.1987 on leasehold basis at a premium of Rs.32,72,000/-. As per the requirement the appellant paid 25% of the amount of premium. In pursuance thereof a letter of allotment was issued in favour of the appellant on 13.4.1987. The balance amount of 75% of the premium was required to be paid in instalments by the year 1990. It was not paid and a dispute arose.

4. The objection of the appellant has been that necessary development of the area was not done nor the amenities as required were being provided. Ultimately, after some opportunities were provided to him to make the payment of the amount, the lease in favour of the appellant was cancelled by th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top