H.K.SEMA, S.B.SINHA
Bank Of India – Appellant
Versus
O. P. Swaranakar etc. – Respondent
Voluntary Retirement Schemes (VRS) of Nationalised Banks and State Bank of India are contractual in nature, constituting an invitation to treat rather than a direct offer or proposal. [judgement_subject] (!) [1000075830044][1000075830045][1000075830051]
An employee's application under the VRS constitutes an offer, which can be revoked or withdrawn by the employee before acceptance by the competent authority, notwithstanding any clause in the scheme declaring the application irrevocable. [VERY IMPORTANT POINT][judgement_subject][judgement_act_referred] (!) (!) [1000075830009][1000075830011][1000075830043][1000075830044][1000075830050][1000075830051]
Provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Sections 2 and 5) apply to VRS schemes, as contracts of employment are governed by contract law unless superseded by statute or statutory rules. [judgement_act_referred][1000075830037][1000075830049][1000075830050]
The employer bank does not acquire unilateral authority to determine the employer-employee relationship merely upon receipt of the employee's VRS application; acceptance in writing by the competent authority is required for the retirement to take effect. (!) (!) [1000075830009][1000075830043][1000075830046]
Banks cannot accept VRS applications after the expiry of the scheme's operative period, as all actions must strictly adhere to the scheme's terms. [1000075830011][1000075830032][1000075830046]
Writ petitions challenging VRS acceptance despite withdrawal are maintainable under Article 226, as banks are 'State' under Article 12, and actions may violate Articles 14 (arbitrariness) and 21 (right to livelihood). [1000075830013][1000075830015][1000075830047][1000075830048]
Employees who accept ex-gratia or other benefits under the VRS cannot later withdraw or challenge the scheme, as they waive contractual rights and are estopped from approbating and reprobating. [1000075830015] (!) [1000075830047]
The VRS schemes are not statutory regulations but contractual, so they are not ultra vires Section 19(1) or (4) of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970; the laying requirement before Parliament is directory, not mandatory. [judgement_act_referred] (!) [1000075830015][1000075830037][1000075830038][1000075830040]
For State Bank of India VRS, the scheme differs slightly; appeals by SBI are allowed, distinguishing it from nationalised banks. [1000075830002][1000075830005][1000075830022][1000075830041][1000075830042]
Final directions: Appeals by nationalised banks dismissed (except where benefits accepted); SBI appeals allowed; certain Punjab & Haryana High Court matters remanded; Uttaranchal High Court judgments set aside. (!) [1000075830016]
Scheme eligibility limited to employees with 15 years' service or 40 years' age (excluding certain categories like those in disciplinary proceedings or specialists); benefits include ex-gratia (lesser of 60 days' salary per year or remaining service months), gratuity, pension/PF, leave encashment. [1000075830006] (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) [1000075830007][1000075830041] (!) (!) (!)
Competent authority has discretion to accept/reject based on bank requirements, with reasons recorded for rejection; acceptance communicated in writing. (!) [1000075830009][1000075830041] (!) (!)
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.- Leave granted in the special leave petitions.
2. A common question, as to whether an employee who opts for the voluntary retirement pursuant to or in furtherance of a scheme floated by the Nationalised Banks and the State Bank of India would be precluded from withdrawing the said offer, is involved in this batch of appeals which arise out of the judgments of various High Courts.
3. The State Bank of India has been constituted under the State Bank of India Act, 1955 whereas the other banks (hereinafter referred to as the Nationalized Banks, for the sake of brevity) were taken over in terms of the provisions of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings), Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 1970 Act ).
4. The banks were said to be over-staffed. For the purpose of effective management, man power planning was contemplated by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, pursuant whereto and in furtherance whereof, the Government considered the desirability of introducing voluntary retirement scheme to help the banks to right-size their force. In a letter dated 22-5-2000, the Director (IR & BOII), Ministry of Finance, intimated to the concer
Raghunandan v. State of Hyderabad
Rajendra Kumar Verma v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Abdus Salam Choudhury v. The State of Assam & Ors.
T. Linga Godar v. State of Madras
Janardhan Misra v. State of U.P.
M/s. Suraj Besan & Rice Mills v. FCI
A.S. Khongphai v. Special Judicial Officer
Jan Mohammad Noor Mohammad Begban v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
Union of India & Ors. v. Gopal Chandra Misra & Ors.
Punjab National Bank v. P.K. Mittal
Union of India & Anr. v. Wing Commander T. Parthasarathy
Shambhu Murari Sinha v. Project & Development India Ltd. & Anr.
Brijendra Nath Bhargava & Anr. v. Harsh Wardhan & Ors.
Shri Lachoo Mal v. Shri Radhey Shyam
M/s. Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd. & Ors. v. The State of Haryana
Har Shankar & Ors. v. The Dy. Excise & Taxation Commr. & Ors.
J.N. Srivastava v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.