SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 149

M.B.SHAH, ARUN KUMAR
Collector, Central Excise, Madras – Appellant
Versus
I. T. C. LTD. , Bihar Etc. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shah, J.-Question requiring determination in these appeals is - whether cigarette packets would be other packing containers or boxes within the meaning of Tariff Item No. 17 of Central Excise Tariff Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act )? It is the contention of the Department that cigarette packet is a small paper box and cannot be termed as a container which is relatively a large enclosure. On behalf of the respondent-ITC Limited, which manufactures cigarettes, it is submitted that cigarette packet would be other packing container and not paper box .

2. The aforesaid question is required to be decided by considering the relevant part of Tariff Item No. 17 and Exemption Notification No.66/82-C.E., dated 28.2.1982. Tariff Item No. 17 reads as under-

Item No.17-PAPER AND PAPER BOARD AND ARTICLES THEREOF

Item No. Tariff Description Rate of Duty

17. Paper and Paper Board, all sorts (including paste-board, millboard, strawboard, cardboard and corrugated board), and articles thereof specified below, in or in relation to the manufacture of which any process is ordinarily carried on with the aid of power-

(1), (2)

























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top