SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 141

M.B.SHAH, B.P.SINGH, H.K.SEMA
Tata Hydro-Electric Power Supply Co. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.P. Singh, J.-Special leave granted.

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 5.10.2000 in Appeal No. 144 of 2000 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court affirmed the judgment of the learned Single Judge allowing the Arbitration Petition filed by the respondent under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the award of the Umpire dated 30th March, 1998 on the ground of an error of law apparent on the face of the Award.

2. The appellant-companies are licensees under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). A Power Supply Agreement was executed on 7th July 1971 between the aforesaid companies and President of India represented by Central Railways and Western Railways. Under the agreement electric power is supplied to the railways at a number of points on the railways electrified track route for the operation of the railways electric train services. Clause 20 of the said agreement contains an arbitration clause which reads as under:-

"20.0: In the event of any dispute or difference at any time arising between the Government and the Companies in reg






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top