SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 183

S.B.SINHA, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Shankar Popat Gaidhani – Appellant
Versus
Hiraman Umaji More (Dead) By Lrs. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.-This appeal arises out of a judgment and decree dated 14-12-1990 passed by the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No.640 of 1979 affirming a judgment and decree passed by the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division at Nashik in Special Civil Suit No.57 of 1974.

2. The appellant herein is said to be an agricultural tenant and in occupation of the property in question admeasuring 4 acres, 16 gunthas being Gut No. 189 (Survey Nos. 23/2 and 23/3) situated at Village Palse in the District of Nashik. The said property admittedly belonged to Original Defendant No.1 (since deceased). On or about 2.7.1970, an agreement of sale was executed by him in favour of Defendant No.7. Ganu Mahadu Gayakhe. The said agreement was cancelled. Defendant No.1 thereafter agreed to sell the suit land to the Defendant No.8. The said agreement was also cancelled by Original Defendant No.1 and the amount of advance taken by him was repaid. He then entered into another agreement with the plaintiff in respect of the suit land, the consideration whereof was fixed at Rs.20,000/-. By way of earnest money, a sum of Rs.10,000/- was paid by the plaintiff to Defendant No.1. At the relevant time, Origi



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top