SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 172

R.C.LAHOTI, ARUN KUMAR
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Janki Devi Pal – Respondent


ORDER

In the year 1995 the respondent was elected as Zila Panchayat Adhyaksh in District Sultanpur, State of UP. Certain complaints were received against her wherein the State Government directed an inquiry to be made by the District Magistrate who in his turn got the preliminary inquiry conducted through Additional District Magistrate (Establishment), Sultanpur. Acting on the preliminary inquiry report and a supplementary report prepared by the Additional District Magistrate, the State Government instituted a formal inquiry and at the same time directed the respondent to be divested of financial and administrative powers exercised by her in the capacity of Zila Panchayat Adhyaksh.

2. Section 29 of Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Adhiniyam 1961 (U.P. Act No.32 of 1961), (hereinafter the Act , for short) and Rule 4 of Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Panchayat and Zila Panchayats (Removal of Pramukhs, Up-Pramukhs, Adhyakshas and Upadhyakshas) Enquiry Rules, 1977 (hereinafter Enquiry Rules , for short) framed in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 237 read with Sections 16 and 29 of the Act provide as under:

Act

Section 29. Removal of Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha.-(1) If














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top