SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 253

R.C.LAHOTI, BRIJESH KUMAR
R. Balakrishna Pillai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment

Brijesh Kumar, J.—This is a case in which the appellants before us in Criminal Appeal No. 372 of 2001 and Criminal Appeal No. 373 of 2001 have been convicted under Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short `the Act ) for having caused, M/s. Graphite India Ltd. (for short ‘M/s. GIL’), Bangalore, to obtain valuable thing namely, electricity by selling it to the said company illegally and by abusing their official position as public servants which also resulted in pecuniary advantage to M/s. GIL to the tune of Rs. 19 lakhs and odd. So far the said two appellants themselves are concerned, it is neither the case of the prosecution nor the finding of any court that they gained or acquired any kind of benefit, pecuniary or otherwise, out of the transaction in question. The High Court, on the other hand, finds that there is nothing to show that for obtaining Kerala electricity any illegal gratification was given to the appellants or any illegal means was employed by M/s. GIL.

2. The two appellants for the aforesaid conviction have been sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each, in defau















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top