SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 260

S.S.M.QUADRI, ASHOK BHAN
Sanden Vikas (India) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, New Delhi – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal, by the assessee, arises from the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal at New Delhi (for short, the Tribunal) in Final Order No.E/195/95-81, dated March 31, 1995.

2. The appellant-assessee is a manufacturer of car air-conditioning kits. It classified the said goods under item No.5 of Heading 8415 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (for short, the Act) for the  purpose of availing the benefit of exemption of Notification No.166/86-CE, dated March 1, 1986 (as amended from time to time). Though the appellant sought to contend that it was only manufacturing parts of the air-conditioning kit and, therefore, the kit cannot be treated as an air-conditioner, the Assistant Collector did treat the same as air-conditioning system falling under item No.3 of Heading 8415 of the Notification. That order is said to be the subject matter of an appeal. Be that as it may, on March 20, 1990, a new Entry, item No.8, was added to the table of the Notification, which reads thus:

Sl. Heading Description of Rate Conditions No. No. or goods

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top