SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 411

S.S.M.QUADRI, ASHOK BHAN
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Indalco Industries – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.-The Union of India [for short, the Revenue ] is in appeal against the judgment and order of the High Court at Allahabad in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 1102 of 1995 passed on January 1, 1996.

2. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is, whether the High Court is justified in quashing paragraphs (14) to (18) of the impugned show cause notice dated June 30, 1995.

3. The facts giving rise to this appeal may briefly be noted.

4. The respondent-assessee manufactures aluminium and its products. The goods manufactured by the assessee were cleared on the basis of valuation under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 [for short, the Act ] during the period 1990-91. On June 30, 1995, the Revenue issued show cause notice purporting to be under Section 11-A of the Act demanding duty in a sum of Rs. 45.98 crores on the allegation that due to clandestine removal of the goods and incorrect valuation of the goods, there has been non-levy and short-levy of the excise duty. The assessee, without replying to the show cause notice, challenged the same before the High Court in the afore-mentioned writ petition on November





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top