SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 361

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Kailash Nath Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Enquiry Officer, (R. K. Rai) , Allahabad Bank – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shivaraj, V. Patil, J.-The appellant was and officer in the Allahabad Bank when disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him on account of certain alleged irregularities. Following charges were framed against him:-

ARTICLE - I

That the said Shri K.N. Gupta while functioning as Manager during the period from March, 1983 to April, 1986, allowed advances to various borrowers without observing the norms procedure laid down from time to time by Head Office. Due to his negligence Bank s money is in jeopardy. Out of good number of irregular advances, few cases are taken hereafter.

Advances for pumpsets have been allowed under Minor irrigation loan scheme-

(1) without observing the requirement of possessing the minimum land holding by the borrowers. Few cases having such irregularities are as follows:-

Name Date Amount Land holding Borrower Advance Advance

Sri Ram Ratan 29.3.85 Rs. 4750/- 1.37 acres Ram (Jt.A/c)

Sri Indra Deo 11.3.85 Rs.1200/- 1.64 acres Singh Yadav

(b) Under the aforesaid minor irrigation scheme advances for pumpsets have been allowed without obtaining the completion report of boring f











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top