SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 489

N.S.HEGDE, B.P.SINGH
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwant – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Santosh Hedge, J.-The respondents herein were charged for offences punishable under Section 302 and under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC by the VIth Additional Sessions Judge, Badaun for having committed the murder of one Jagan son of Jaspal Singh (PW 1) on 19.9.1982 at about 10 a.m. by the use of fire arms and lathis. On appeal, the High Court of Allahabad allowed the same and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the respondents and acquitted them.

It is against the said judgment of the High Court, the State of U.P. is in appeal.

2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are :

3. There was some dispute between the respondents and Jaspal Singh who has been examined as PW 1 in this case in regard to certain land originally owned by one Naraini. PW 1 claimed that he was in possession of the said land on batai basis whereas the respondents claimed that they were in possession of the said land by virtue of the agreement of sale executed by the said Naraini s heirs after her death. The further case of the prosecution is that at the relevant point of time PW 1 had grown some nuts and millets which were ready for harvest and on the date of incident PW







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top