SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 473

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Shankar K. Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-This is the second journey of the parties to this Court. The basic issue is whether the appellants herein were legally recruited as teachers during the period from 1981 to 1983.

2. These two appeals are directed against two judgments of the High Court of Patna. While C.A.No. 916/1999 is directed against the judgment dismissing the writ petition filed by 55 persons including the appellants, C.A.No. 1524/1999 is directed against the judgment in Letters Patent Appeal whereby the order of the learned Single Judge was affirmed. The writ petition was filed by the present appellants.

3. Factual background so far as undisputed is essentially as follows :

About 2000 persons were appointed as primary teachers in various districts of Bihar. As legality of the appointments was questioned in various forums, enquiries were conducted. Orders were passed terminating the services of the teachers including the appellants who had been appointed during the relevant period. Such orders of termination were challenged before the High Court, which by judgment dated 11.8.1989 directed to take up the appointment of teachers in elementary schools in various districts by inviting appli





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top