SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 514

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Commandant, 11th Battalion, A. P. Special Police (IR), Cuddapah, Cuddapah District – Appellant
Versus
B. Shankar Naik – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-These appeals involve common point of dispute and, therefore, are disposed of by this judgment, which shall govern each one of them.

2. The appeals are directed against judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in several writ petitions by which judgments of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (in short the Tribunal ) were set aside. A batch of 32 original applications was disposed of by a common order, The applicants in some of those moved the High Court as Tribunal had rejected their applications. They are respondents in Civil Appeals 3618, 3619, 3620, 7206 to 7209, 7080, 7394 and 7395/2000. Six others had filed a joint petition before the Tribunal. They are respondents in Civil Appeal No.4949/2000.

3. Factual position is almost undisputed and needs to be noted in brief:-

The respondents in these appeals were appointed as Constables along with several others, total number being 732. They were placed on probation for a period of three years and were also required to undergo training in the A.P. Police Recruits School under Rule 11 (a) of the A.P. Police Subordinate Service Rules (in short the Special Rules ). One of the conditions stipulated in































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top