SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 521

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, P.VENKATARAMA REDDI
Narayan Prasad Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.-An extent of 2.428 hectares of land comprising Khasra No. 400/1 and 399/2 situated in Patan Tehsil of Jabalpur District was sought to be acquired for the purpose of establishing Krishi Upaj Mandi Yard. The Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was published on 29.12.1989. Declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act was also simultaneously published. For the same purpose, some other plots of land were also acquired. According to the appellant, as regards other lands, emergency provision under Section 17 was invoked. The appellant contended that even though Section 17 was not invoked in respect of the appellant s property, there was no inquiry as contemplated under Section 5A of the Act and, therefore, the whole proceedings initiated for acquisition of the appellant s land are illegal and liable to be quashed.

2. The appellant filed Writ Petition No. 4386/2000 before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. The appellant alleged in the Writ Petition that he had filed a Civil suit registered as C.S. No. 2-A/91 before the Court of Civil Judge, Class I challenging Section 4(1) Notification and Declaration under Section (6)







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top